|
Post by bobc on Aug 8, 2009 9:48:08 GMT -5
We desperately need more Wolverine
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 14:59:02 GMT -5
Sharky I swear to God, three hrs ago I checked this forum and you hadn't replied yet--and then I went to lunch. As I was driving back from lunch, I started thinking how odd it was that you hadn't sprung for the bait--but voila!!! There you were!! obviously you were wisely keeping your own counsel until the time was right for your incisive and telling reply. These things must not be rushed!
Beta--I don't remember that test of the Scarlet Witch's powers at all. I wonder how that passed me by?
|
|
|
Ronin
Jul 24, 2009 14:19:28 GMT -5
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 14:19:28 GMT -5
I'm going to be good...
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 13:58:26 GMT -5
I didn't feel one way or the other about Wanda learning witchcraft--but what I definitely loved was how her time with Agatha Harkness resulted in a much more powerful character, who wasn't constantly exhausted. God that got on my nerves. And then she was always losing her powers, and getting them back--usually an inferior version of them! The only thing worse was that one issue where the Avengers fought the Sub-Mariner, and the Wasp had a stupid safety pin looking thingee as a stinger. That was just stupid. Jan shoulda sent Hank back to the anthill until he could come up with a real weapon.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 13:43:44 GMT -5
Sharky baby--I am laughing! You never disappoint!! When I typed my post, I could just feel your information-steeped eyes burning through me---as you readied yourself to give a complete encyclopedic dissertation on Wanda's hex power! I was right!!
I was actually going to do a listing of Wanda's various hex powers, but in the end I was far, far too lazy.
GOOD JOB
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 7:48:31 GMT -5
So I guess nobody is reading this book. in a way I can't blame people because Hudlin's first couple of years were really pretty mediocre, but he's gotten much much better. And the art is really really good
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 24, 2009 7:45:24 GMT -5
I loved it! I wouldn't say it was anywhere near his best work, but I thought it was nostalgic and kind of sweet in a way. "1985" certainly wasn't a standard super hero comic by any stretch of the imagination--but for me it really captured how a little kid views the magical world of super heroes.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 23, 2009 9:20:23 GMT -5
Hey guys--I know everyone is rolling their eyes and thinking I'm heavily biased in favor for all things Black Panther--but the newest episode of Black Panther is IMO EXCELLENT. I'm not sure what happened to Hudlin about a year ago--but BP has been consistently good for a very long time.
T'Challa is back to his old noble self, and Hudlin has introduced spiritual elements to Wakandan society that is consistent with the core character first presented in FF 52. The art is beautiful and some of the new villains presented are very interesting! And last but not least--the storyline is not bogged down by being linked to 500 BIG EVENT story lines.
And for icing on the cake--NO WOLVERINE.
Good job, Mr Hudlin
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 22, 2009 16:12:05 GMT -5
I recall a letter printed in the 70's--where a fan complained about how de-powered Wanda had become over the years. He mentioned, correctly, that at one point Wanda fought the Enchantress to a standstill by herself--and just a few years later she drained herself after one (genrally) useless hex.
I thought Wanda became a really exciting character after that oen scene where she brought down that meteorite, smashing it into Kang's robot. That was such a cool moment for me as a kiddo. In that one moment Wanda became a true force to be reckoned with--instead of a liability.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 22, 2009 15:56:34 GMT -5
we've talked about this before--but Wanda's powers, more than any other super heroes', have always been all over the map. I noticed that bit in the Essential Hulk about Wanda having to touch her hands together
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 22, 2009 13:00:54 GMT -5
Hey Starfoxx--I haven't read any of this series yet (not for any particular reason-- it just kind of slipped by me in a sea of Wolverine titles) but based on your recommendations I am definitely going to pick up the trade paperback when it comes out. I've loved everything Millar's done with the exception of Kick Azz.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 22, 2009 8:52:45 GMT -5
well it's the Essential Edition of the Hulk, which is a black and white collection of a group of back issues, and yes issue #128 was amongst them. That is one of the few Avengers appearances that I never saw before!
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 21, 2009 15:06:46 GMT -5
I concur!
Hey HB--I bought the two Essential Hulk editions that have that Inhumans appearance I asked you about a while back, and the next addition which has teh Avengers basically stalking the Hulk again! Thanks for the info
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 21, 2009 8:43:40 GMT -5
Hee hee--Howabout a dark Doctor Doom? Or Doctor Doom light?
I feel like I am back in the 80's...blech
Shiryu--I think this Wolverine is Wolverine's son or some crap like that. I honestly don't know. honestly don't care.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 20, 2009 11:03:41 GMT -5
well if you don't kill off major characters, what contrived plot devices will hack writers use then?
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 17, 2009 15:31:14 GMT -5
It was pretty lame and boring. I only bought it because I like the characters. Happens a lot these days
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 17, 2009 15:28:42 GMT -5
Sorry I put this in the wrong area. I had no idea there was a movie thread on this forum. I am retarded.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 17, 2009 13:28:29 GMT -5
Actually I'm almost impossibly good-looking for my age.
At least my five dogs think so.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 15:50:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 13:49:43 GMT -5
I feel your pain DL. My face is so dry and leathery it looks like a saddle bag with eyes.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 13:48:14 GMT -5
I bought the comic not knowing it was for girls--but I will say one thing about my experience in games. We are constantly told that if you have a female character, she MUST have huge breasts. It's a fact--people will probably lie and deny it, but it is true. Having large breasts appeals to most males, and it doesn't turn off most females. Sex sells.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 13:11:54 GMT -5
Sharky's are longer than mine, young man
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 10:26:11 GMT -5
Really? You don't like that? I thought it was good!
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 16, 2009 9:32:26 GMT -5
Dl--it's both! It has to do, at the end of the day, with how much it costs to create a certain number of game assets. There is so much sloth and waste on our end--a CEO will look at the books and see that in, say, a one year period, American artists got half the game assets done for 200k. Then they look at the Chinese crew, who finished the entire asset list in 9 months, costing 100k. I have seen this kind of thing happen many times. On the other hand there are real problems with dealing with foreign nations--mostly the language barrier and time difference. It is really hard to get changes made when the company you are dealing with is asleep during our work-day!
In my 13 years of doing video games--I will tell you it is a FACT that the main reason most games either flop, or never come out in the first place, is because of the inability of management to decide, and stick with, the vision of what a game is going to be. Let me give you a stellar example from 2007. Here in Austin, a very large, very well known company, started working on an MMO (massive multi-player Online game) in 2001, and it didn't get released until late 2007. I came to this company in late 2006, and worked on another project, and when I got there, all the artists were laughing at the original concept sketches for the other team's MMO. Apparently the MMO was originally going to be a fantasy oriented, kind of sword-and-sorcery looking game. Well three or four years into the making of this MMO, everyone decided that the fantasy look sucked, and they completely changed everything to a more sci-fi look and had to just dump years of assets--which really means millions of dollars. I sat there thinking, okay all these idiots are laughing at the unicorns and elves from the original concept sketches--but who in the hell okayed them in the first place? How do three or four years go by and then you just throw the whole game out? The time to decide on the look of a game is before you start making it.
Everyone thought the whole mess was funny--and I'm thinking these people have no concept of money. None. So the MMO team switched to the sci-fi look, and the game came out after 7 years and one figure I heard was $70 mill, and the game completely failed. Nobody bought it. People didn't even know it came out. We all--even those of us who were on other projects-lost our jobs because of the failure of that game.
The worst part is that after the MMO failed, upper management basically blamed it on the fact that people didn't want to play a sci-fi MMO!!!! But the real reason it failed was that while everybody was harping on what the game should look like, nobody was paying attention to the fact that the GAME WASN'T FUN. It didn't draw you in, or make you want to keep playing it. I have talked to dozens of people who played it and they all said the same thing--it wasn't fun.
So of course management, who couldn't agree on a direction, blamed the team and the only "team members" who came out of it looking good were the outsource team in China. Why? Because they cost less and had nothing to do with design or direction--they were just handed sketches and had to build them in 3D. Now, these managerial geniuses have come to the conclusion that the only way to make a game inexpensively is to go almost exclusively with outsourcing--leaving out their role entirely.
DL--I am painfully well aware that the Chinese can live like kings in their country on a quarter of what we make, and they are. But remember it was OUR politicians who started this whole Global Economy/out-sourcing scheme. It started with an idea by Bush Sr (New World Order) and Clinton got most of the trade agreements pushed through on the premise that these agreements would actually help the US grow economically--without mentioning the fact that our jobs would leave in droves. Bush Sr and McCain and all those guys were all for it. These people don't give a d**n about us.
Now our economy is collapsing because, frankly, the good paying jobs are gone while our cost of living is still rising. We have become a service-oriented economy, in other words, low-paying, menial jobs. California has a 20% unemployment rate today, and that is disastrous.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 15, 2009 12:44:36 GMT -5
Redstate--you are so right. Every Marvel artist I have ever spoken to says Quesada is the best boss you could ask for. When I hear that, I hate to say it, but the first thing that pops in my head is that probably means he lets them do whatever they want. I know from direct experience that managing artists is a thankless job--many are prima donnas with very little work ethic, and they tend to like to gang up on management. So basically the only way to keep your job is to lay low and not make any waves. Even the smallest confrontation can get you fired.
I have watched several artists in the games field do absolutely NOTHING for months and get away with it. I've seen whole projects get canned because nobody's doing any work and management is just too spineless to say anything. Consequently so many of our jobs are being outsourced because trust me, the Chinese have no problem enforcing the rules.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 15, 2009 8:51:53 GMT -5
Hi Badger and welcome to the forum. There are some titles that are somewhat self-focused, like Fantastic Four, Black Panther and Captain America--but not many.
Hey have you guys read the Resurrection of Captain America? By Brubaker and the awesome Bryan Fitch? The way they are bringing back CA is, for once, actually pretty damned cool. And it is a thrill for me to see Fitch render Hank Pym, the Vision and the Falcon. The beauty of his art almost made me forget what a stupid idea it was to kill off the Wasp and make Pym the new Wasp--I mean seriously, how many personas is Hank Pym going to have?
Ant Man Giant Man Goliath Yellowjacket Hank Pym The New Wasp
By the way, is the Wasp (the real one) really dead? With all the alternate realities and general incoherence these days it's hard for me to tell what's real and what's not
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 14, 2009 16:09:41 GMT -5
Interesting.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 14, 2009 15:39:49 GMT -5
Waspie--I agree that there is a lot of blame to be placed on today's overall sorry state of story writing. No doubt about it.
I also think the serious lack of battles is hurting Marvel, too. I mean what is going on? Look at Busiek's run--battles, battle and more battles. There was a time in Marvel history where you were guaranteed to have at least one battle per issue. When I look at old comic covers--it is always the issues with classic battles that I remember most fondly. Thing vs Sub Mariner, Thor vs. Silver Surfer, Defenders vs Avengers, Hulk vs Thing, all that stuff.
Now it seems like comics for the most part are just endless sub-par dialogue, standing and posing, and plots that go nowhere.
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 14, 2009 13:36:29 GMT -5
I see. Yeah I know I stopped buying Avengers during the Heroes Reborn era, so I wouldn't be surprised if sales slumped at that time if even a hardcore like me wasn't buying.
Re: the recession. This recession is anything but over. It is only beginning. Obama's Stimulous Package was basically just giving money to various banks and businesses creating the impression that things were/are improving, but it only that--a temporary, illusory effect (not getting into politics here, just economics). Unemployment is far worse than it was six months ago and it is still climbing. California is close to 20% right now and those are Depression era stats. And those stats only count people taking unemployment benefits--it does NOT count people whose benefits ran out, people who stopped looking for work, and people who are under-employed. Everybody I know is scared of losing their jobs right now--and when people feel that way they don't spend money.
Obama just now said we are months away from any kind of recovery, and that unemployment will "keep ticking upwards for months."
|
|
|
Post by bobc on Jul 14, 2009 9:28:24 GMT -5
Freedom--I used to read Wizard through the 90's and I seem to recall the Avengers were always in the top 5. Am I wrong about that? It seemed like the X-Men, Avengers and Justice League were always battling for 1st place.
I think two things are resulting in a sales slump--one: too many titles to choose from and two: the recession. I live in Austin and we have been somewhat sheltered from this severe recession, but I know it is really, really bad in some areas of the country.
I wonder if overall comic sales are down or if sales are just spread over so many titles that it appears like nothing is selling well. I go to Austin Books and there are so many different comics it's almost dizzying.
|
|