|
Post by humanbelly on Jun 16, 2013 7:09:28 GMT -5
Oh golly, we're slipping-- ! Should we be starting a NO SPOILERS thread for initial discussion of the newest Superman reboot? Want to go ahead and consider this the spot to begin it?
I haven't seen the film yet myself, and was considering going today (Father's Day). . . but honestly, EVERYONE I've heard from that could be considered a Superman fan has really not been liking the ending at all. More than a couple spoke of leaving the theater angry, even (not a good way to exit a 2-1/2 hour film). My 14 year old daughter's usually a good sport about superhero films (and REALLY liked Green Lantern!), but this doesn't sound like something I would want to subject her to.
Feedback? NO SPOILERS, remember--!
HB
|
|
|
Post by tomspasic on Jun 19, 2013 6:01:43 GMT -5
Gene Hackman wears a wig.
I haven't seen it yet, but overall, reactions are slightly positive in places I lurk. There are nay-sayers, but it seems even most of those felt it a well made film even if they did not like every decision or story point.
|
|
|
Post by wundagoreborn on Jun 19, 2013 10:39:25 GMT -5
Second hand report: my 13 yo son gave it a B, my wife gave it a D. Both justified their grade with the same fact -- non-stop Transformer-like speed fight scenes.
I have yet to see it. My wife's reaction makes me think I'll wait for the Red Box.
|
|
|
Post by Marvel Boy on Jun 19, 2013 11:15:01 GMT -5
Being a Superman fan, I want to see this film. In various other areas of the Interweb, I've read mixed reviews though. Everyone seems to agree that Cavill and Adams do commendable jobs in their respective roles but the sheer level of violence and wanton destruction has turned some people off, especially if you consider the amount of unseen casualties implied by that level of destruction.
And for the record, I enjoyed Returns. I thought Singer demonstrated his love and affection for the character quite well, a feeling I don't quite get from Snyder.
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Cowl on Jun 27, 2013 13:42:31 GMT -5
I quite liked Returns too.
This didn't really do it for me. A lack of drama meant that there was little to latch on to or with which to place any emotional investment into the action. The sense of insignificance in the face of the monumental levels of destruction in the battles between godlike beings made me think of Alan Moore's Marvelman more than Superman.
Undeniably spectacular though and some of the flashback sequences were effective. The manner of Johnathan Kent's death, especially compared with how it was handled previously, was a bit of an indicator regarding this movie's tendency towards bigger, louder, faster.
The attempt to give Supes more psychological depth had some interesting aspects, but didn't really go anywhere. Ultimately there isn't any story or theme, either personal or conceptual to tie this all together and make it matter.
Rather humourless.
Better than Iron Man 3 though for my money -but I really hated that.
|
|
|
Post by humanbelly on Jun 30, 2013 5:54:30 GMT -5
Have we waited long enough, y'think?
[SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS]
HBSon & I did go see the movie earlier this week, and I put up a rather long reaction post about it on the related thread on dlw66's Bronze Age Babies blog. I'm gonna take a chance and simply re-post it here, rather than try to write the whole blamed thing all over again:
And Crimson C, I came to the same conclusion about it being humorless. It occurred to me that we never had a legitimate laugh throughout the whole film. There's not any sense of FUN whatsoever. Honestly, the much-derided Green Lantern had a better sense of fun and wonder than this film. In fact (I'll just go ahead and say it out loud) I enjoyed myself at that film much more than I did this one. Sadly, the failure of that movie may have served only to solidify the WB mindset that the future for DC superhero films lies in clinging to that relentless sense of noir gravity. . . that every film will need to be a huge, grim, sweeping epic. Ugh. AVENGERS was just about the most fun film I've ever seen that still packed a punch with both dramatics and with action. And yet there were MANY moments that were nearly lost simply because they were covered by laughter in the audience (never heard the "Puny God" line, nor Loki's beaten-up squeaking until the third time I saw it-!). The Spiderman films? ALL of them had legitimate laughs. Thor, Cap & Hulk films? Yep. Second Hulk film more than the first, which partly what helped it be a better film. RDJr's dry comic delivery as Tony Stark is the heart of the Iron Man franchise. You have to wonder how the Warner Brothers suits manage to not get this simple fact so persistently. . .
Okay, okay-- longest post EVER. Signing off!
HB
|
|
|
Post by Marvel Boy on Jul 21, 2013 10:16:17 GMT -5
Well, unfortunately, I missed it at the theaters so have to wait till it hits DVD, Pay-for-View. Based on everyone's comments (good review there HB), this was a dry, grim film. Sad, even Reeves had some good chuckle moments in his films.
Warner announced at SDCC that the sequel will be Superman/Batman. Cavill and the rest will return in their respective roles but I guess the hunt is now on for the next Batman.
|
|
|
Post by spiderman1984 on Sept 1, 2013 1:40:34 GMT -5
i saw this movie, being a Superman fan, i thought it was a great movie, i can't wait to see the Superman, Batman Movie, it is going to be great.
|
|
|
Post by Ignore Me! on Sept 10, 2013 16:25:01 GMT -5
this would have been better
|
|