|
Post by Shiryu on Aug 22, 2006 5:22:27 GMT -5
I've just noticed that there has been a lot of "karma" smiting recently, with a few people gone under 0 and an average of 3 points taken away from many members. I'm not sure why that is, since there hasn't been any really flaming topic (except for the usual Bendis stuff, but we are used to that), but anyway remember that someone shouldn't be smiten only for expressing his opinion (even if you don't agree with it) in a civil manner.
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Aug 22, 2006 10:12:13 GMT -5
Agreed. I've been away from the boards for a few days as our computer at home is in for virus cleaning. But, as school has started back up and I am online most of the time now I have seen some less then friendly tones on some of our topics. Some of this has come from merely the reporting of news items. Others have come from general "I know more than you" types of posts. Hey, if you do -- fine. No need to throw anything negative up in someone's face.
I have also noticed that many of our "hot areas" haven't had too many posts in the past several days. I hope that is not because people have left or don't feel "safe" around here anymore. After all, we do have a thread going that is entitled "Why this is a great place" [sic].
|
|
steed
Reservist Avenger
Posts: 215
|
Post by steed on Aug 22, 2006 10:36:41 GMT -5
Hey I'm all for a heated argument every now and then but I agree, some of the posts I've seen recently have been boarder line nasty. We need to remember that we're just discussing lines on paper, nothing really important. If you don't like something some one wrote, respond to the post and don't attack the poster. And if you think you're being attacked, let it roll. Remember, it's only lines on paper.
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Aug 22, 2006 11:28:03 GMT -5
I think another resource that is available to us and should be taken advantage of is the personal message. I have enjoyed some private conversations with some of our members, and this might be a nice consideration for some of the debates that might have gotten out-of-hand.
|
|
|
Post by Shiryu on Aug 22, 2006 13:33:22 GMT -5
True, if a debate between two people gets too hot, the private messages should be used instead. I have been very busy recently because I've started to work, and so I couldn't stay around too long, but now I finally have internet home, so I'll try to monitor things more. I'll also restore some karma around, especially for those gone under zero. If I miss someone let me know.
|
|
|
Post by Black Knight on Aug 22, 2006 15:42:38 GMT -5
I like the fact that pm's are on this board, I was on a board that did not have them, and no matter how much the members suggested it, the owner would not do it, and of course it ended with lots of fighting on the board and nothing really being discussed.
|
|
|
Post by The Night Phantom on Aug 22, 2006 17:26:25 GMT -5
We need to remember that we're just discussing lines on paper, nothing really important. Wow, you sound like the President discussing the Constitution! (Now, there’s a way to start a flame war, folks! )Seriously, as a forum for ideas, literature (which comics, good or bad, qualify as) is important. But so is being civil—so, I’ll repeat Steed’s sage counsel:
|
|
|
Post by asgardian on Aug 24, 2006 22:31:05 GMT -5
There was an argument? I haven't seen one on these boards yet.
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Sept 5, 2006 15:31:53 GMT -5
Ah, gentlemen (and ladies, for that matter...):
As there is a bit of testiness going on in another thread, let's reiterate what people have said makes these boards great. People should feel free to post something that they are interested in, and respondents should feel free to agree or disagree publicly.
That being said, I think what makes a board work is when someone posts an idea, or particularly a new piece of art or storyline or Internet gossip, they get a quick reaction -- usually the first reader's first impression. THAT is what starts good conversation. That is, as long as the rebuttal is not an attack (eg "What kind of idiot would think that is cool?!?"). We should be free to voice our opinions and keep them clearly that -- our opinions. Mind your tone, and if it starts to get personal, take it to the PM's. Most of the rest of us don't want to read fighting-stuff on these boards.
And of course, when stating/rebutting, etc. do so in an intelligent manner. Give a reason why you like or dislike an idea et al. Let us know what you're thinking -- electronic transmissions don't always come across like you thought it sounded when you hit "post reply".
Agreed?
|
|
|
Post by imperiusrex on Sept 5, 2006 16:16:08 GMT -5
Ah, gentlemen (and ladies, for that matter...): As there is a bit of testiness going on in another thread, let's reiterate what people have said makes these boards great. People should feel free to post something that they are interested in, and respondents should feel free to agree or disagree publicly. That being said, I think what makes a board work is when someone posts an idea, or particularly a new piece of art or storyline or Internet gossip, they get a quick reaction -- usually the first reader's first impression. THAT is what starts good conversation. That is, as long as the rebuttal is not an attack (eg "What kind of idiot would think that is cool?!?"). We should be free to voice our opinions and keep them clearly that -- our opinions. Mind your tone, and if it starts to get personal, take it to the PM's. Most of the rest of us don't want to read fighting-stuff on these boards. And of course, when stating/rebutting, etc. do so in an intelligent manner. Give a reason why you like or dislike an idea et al. Let us know what you're thinking -- electronic transmissions don't always come across like you thought it sounded when you hit "post reply". Agreed? well why not just do away with smiting in the first place? doesn't seem to really serve a purpose...
|
|
|
Post by Black Knight on Sept 6, 2006 7:53:45 GMT -5
Ah, gentlemen (and ladies, for that matter...): As there is a bit of testiness going on in another thread, let's reiterate what people have said makes these boards great. People should feel free to post something that they are interested in, and respondents should feel free to agree or disagree publicly. That being said, I think what makes a board work is when someone posts an idea, or particularly a new piece of art or storyline or Internet gossip, they get a quick reaction -- usually the first reader's first impression. THAT is what starts good conversation. That is, as long as the rebuttal is not an attack (eg "What kind of idiot would think that is cool?!?"). We should be free to voice our opinions and keep them clearly that -- our opinions. Mind your tone, and if it starts to get personal, take it to the PM's. Most of the rest of us don't want to read fighting-stuff on these boards. And of course, when stating/rebutting, etc. do so in an intelligent manner. Give a reason why you like or dislike an idea et al. Let us know what you're thinking -- electronic transmissions don't always come across like you thought it sounded when you hit "post reply". Agreed? well why not just do away with smiting in the first place? doesn't seem to really serve a purpose... I agree, all it ends up being is a way for people to respond without thinking and typiing up a post. Also, I find it amusing that people smite others for defending there opinions. LOL Oh well.
|
|
|
Post by Shiryu on Sept 6, 2006 13:15:23 GMT -5
Unfortunately the whole karma thing can not be switched off from what I've seen in the control panel, and it's not recorded either, so I can't find the "smiter" (yet, I'm narrowing the list down)
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Oct 2, 2006 18:28:18 GMT -5
In the past two days I've seen a new member (Welcome, friend... Here, have a smite!!) and our old pal W get smited for what? Search me... I exalted them both back to zero because I think unless someone is really nasty or totally obnoxious, there isn't a reason to give them negative karma.
|
|
steed
Reservist Avenger
Posts: 215
|
Post by steed on Oct 3, 2006 6:48:09 GMT -5
I notice in another thread that a new member with one post had -2 karma. Why? What sense does that make.
Anyone I see with negative karma will get a karma point from me.
|
|
|
Post by von Bek on Oct 3, 2006 9:12:11 GMT -5
I like the idea of instead of posting "agree with you", exalt someone you agree with or think made a good point, same thing with smiting, but give someone a negative karma is just childish.
|
|
steed
Reservist Avenger
Posts: 215
|
Post by steed on Oct 3, 2006 11:23:26 GMT -5
I agree with you and gave you a karma point Oh! This is my 100th post. I know that compared to most of you I'm still a neophyte but this is a milestone for me.
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Oct 3, 2006 12:01:36 GMT -5
Congratulations. Maybe you just waste less time at work than some of the rest of us !!
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Doom on Oct 3, 2006 12:10:15 GMT -5
I agree, and it annoyed me when I first came to the boarrd that I went into negative karma pretty quickly for expressing some opinions contrary to others. PS: Oh GOd, I've lost my ONE karma point!
|
|
steed
Reservist Avenger
Posts: 215
|
Post by steed on Oct 3, 2006 12:32:13 GMT -5
Have no fear, Kaptain Karma is here.
|
|
|
Post by Shiryu on Oct 4, 2006 4:29:34 GMT -5
I especially think that, when a karma point is taken, the smiter should say it. It's acceptable to disagree on things (even though karma should not be taken away only if someone expresses a different opinion), but sometimes points disappear without rhime or reason. PS, congratulation for your 100th post, Steed !
|
|