Post by daned on Aug 11, 2006 7:55:50 GMT -5
Hey, how are ya. A little about me first. I realise I could write something continuing the 'is New Avengers really that bad' thread, but as a middle child, who's also a teacher, I have an uncontrollable urge to be the centre of attention, so, while this will be bagging out New Avengers somewhat, I need to tell you a little about myself.
I realised the other day that I was an old-school fan, as it has been twenty-odd years that I've been reading Avengers. My first issue was 283 - 'She Hulk Wild on the Streets" on the cover.
I've stuck with the Avengers ever since. I have missed all but one regular Avengers because of a subscription stuff up, and I bought 5 issues of Heroes Reborn (at least 3 more than any of my mates). And bugger it, I like Harras's Gatherers run.
I've seen Avengers go from great to road kill so many times, and while I've given up on some other titles (Spidey got me into comics in the Amazing Spiderman Gang Wars storyline, but lost me in MacFarlane's ruin <I actually meant to say 'run' but mistyped it. I think I'll leave it>) I've stuck with the Avengers.
I like Bendis. Let's get that out of the way. At issue 20 of NA I re-read his Daredevil run and thought it was great. I've read many of his Ultimate Spiderman run, but only through my mate's Trader Paperbacks and loved them. (As much as I love them, I refuse to pay for 6 comics, in a story that used to be told in one).
But Bendis is not original.
Ennis's Preacher is my favourite comic run of all time. There's no comment boxes in any single issue (I guess I should know what they're called, but I'm guessing you know what I'm talking about). Christopher Priest brilliantly use non-chronological story telling on Quantum and Woody and then Black Panther.
Bendis can do it, and do it well, but he's hardly original. So this cult that's sprang up around him, has me flummoxed.
New Avengers is stuffed. Want proof? I almost quantified it.
I sat down with issues 16-20 - the 'Collective storyline'. I annotated the number of pages and panels that were devoted to characters without Avengers, one Avenger, a couple Avengers, the whole of Avengers doing little more than standing around alking, and the Avengers actually doing something. Basically, there were more panels containing no Avengers than panels containing all the Avengers.
I would like to give you the facts in a brilliantly formatted table, however, I tried to do it while drunk and have no idea where I've put it.
But, if you're interested in seeing what I mean, pick up issues 14 and 15. Issue 14 spends more than half of the comic following Ms Marvel who then TURNS DOWN membership into the Avengers!! So why th %^&$&^ did we follow her for 15 &^$%&*^$ pages? Issue 15 is all about how a SHIELD agent doesn't want to call for help from the Avengers, and then, eventually, does. AND ... THAT ... IS ... IT!!!! And let's not forget that entire storyline. What happens? The entire thing ends with SHIELD using Iron Man and his Superfriends, but still ends with the return of an X-Men villain.
So how can I put the problem into words? I can do it in one.
RESPECT.
Respect the d**n product. Busiek lost me the moment he had the Avengers tied into knots by a guy who - wait for it - had the power of 3 regular humans. Oooohhhh!!! Avengers had Thor.
Bendis has had nothing but piss-weak opponents for a piss-weak collection of Iron Man flunkies. What irritates me is that Bendis hasn't appeared to 'get' any of the Avengers comics that he read. (He's obviously read some since that's where he got the idea for 'Disassembled' - without actually realising the problem was sorted.)
When the Avengers turn up, the situation's sorted. The Avengers don't go looking for members, superheroes graduate to the Avengers. At least Cage has some sort of respect (joining so he can tell his daughter he was an Avenger) but then makes them go work as crossing guards (which remember, took almost an issue).
I think what really gave me the irrits (I think it's an Australianism, so don't bother trying) is that my friend gave me a hard cover copy of Identity Crisis. It blew me away. But I hated that it did, because I've been a Marvel Zombie for years. The only DC comics I've bought have been Vertigo (and only two at that - Preacher and Transmetropolitan) and I've proudly ignored anything they did.
Identity Crisis changed all that. Marvel is supposed to do those stories, d**n it. DC has undefeatable heroes without any moral problems. Marvel does the hero stories. There is nothing more moving to me than Captain America on his knees crying over the torn picture of his mother. After a 5 issue story that had everything in it to tell a full story - and it was in chronological order.
Close to that moment was the last issue of Thunderstrike where, the second full-page splash page - of the entire series - Thor shed a single tear when he realised Eric was dead.
Bugger, I've lost my place.
Respect. That's it.
Bendis doesn't seem to respect the Avengers, or the concept of Avengers. He plays with his little favourites, turning it into issues of Marvel Comics Presents - which also focused on Wolverine.
Bring back my Heroes.
Bring back the Avengers.
(Sorry if this turned into an article. I have a tendency to get self-righteous and verbose after a six pack.)
I realised the other day that I was an old-school fan, as it has been twenty-odd years that I've been reading Avengers. My first issue was 283 - 'She Hulk Wild on the Streets" on the cover.
I've stuck with the Avengers ever since. I have missed all but one regular Avengers because of a subscription stuff up, and I bought 5 issues of Heroes Reborn (at least 3 more than any of my mates). And bugger it, I like Harras's Gatherers run.
I've seen Avengers go from great to road kill so many times, and while I've given up on some other titles (Spidey got me into comics in the Amazing Spiderman Gang Wars storyline, but lost me in MacFarlane's ruin <I actually meant to say 'run' but mistyped it. I think I'll leave it>) I've stuck with the Avengers.
I like Bendis. Let's get that out of the way. At issue 20 of NA I re-read his Daredevil run and thought it was great. I've read many of his Ultimate Spiderman run, but only through my mate's Trader Paperbacks and loved them. (As much as I love them, I refuse to pay for 6 comics, in a story that used to be told in one).
But Bendis is not original.
Ennis's Preacher is my favourite comic run of all time. There's no comment boxes in any single issue (I guess I should know what they're called, but I'm guessing you know what I'm talking about). Christopher Priest brilliantly use non-chronological story telling on Quantum and Woody and then Black Panther.
Bendis can do it, and do it well, but he's hardly original. So this cult that's sprang up around him, has me flummoxed.
New Avengers is stuffed. Want proof? I almost quantified it.
I sat down with issues 16-20 - the 'Collective storyline'. I annotated the number of pages and panels that were devoted to characters without Avengers, one Avenger, a couple Avengers, the whole of Avengers doing little more than standing around alking, and the Avengers actually doing something. Basically, there were more panels containing no Avengers than panels containing all the Avengers.
I would like to give you the facts in a brilliantly formatted table, however, I tried to do it while drunk and have no idea where I've put it.
But, if you're interested in seeing what I mean, pick up issues 14 and 15. Issue 14 spends more than half of the comic following Ms Marvel who then TURNS DOWN membership into the Avengers!! So why th %^&$&^ did we follow her for 15 &^$%&*^$ pages? Issue 15 is all about how a SHIELD agent doesn't want to call for help from the Avengers, and then, eventually, does. AND ... THAT ... IS ... IT!!!! And let's not forget that entire storyline. What happens? The entire thing ends with SHIELD using Iron Man and his Superfriends, but still ends with the return of an X-Men villain.
So how can I put the problem into words? I can do it in one.
RESPECT.
Respect the d**n product. Busiek lost me the moment he had the Avengers tied into knots by a guy who - wait for it - had the power of 3 regular humans. Oooohhhh!!! Avengers had Thor.
Bendis has had nothing but piss-weak opponents for a piss-weak collection of Iron Man flunkies. What irritates me is that Bendis hasn't appeared to 'get' any of the Avengers comics that he read. (He's obviously read some since that's where he got the idea for 'Disassembled' - without actually realising the problem was sorted.)
When the Avengers turn up, the situation's sorted. The Avengers don't go looking for members, superheroes graduate to the Avengers. At least Cage has some sort of respect (joining so he can tell his daughter he was an Avenger) but then makes them go work as crossing guards (which remember, took almost an issue).
I think what really gave me the irrits (I think it's an Australianism, so don't bother trying) is that my friend gave me a hard cover copy of Identity Crisis. It blew me away. But I hated that it did, because I've been a Marvel Zombie for years. The only DC comics I've bought have been Vertigo (and only two at that - Preacher and Transmetropolitan) and I've proudly ignored anything they did.
Identity Crisis changed all that. Marvel is supposed to do those stories, d**n it. DC has undefeatable heroes without any moral problems. Marvel does the hero stories. There is nothing more moving to me than Captain America on his knees crying over the torn picture of his mother. After a 5 issue story that had everything in it to tell a full story - and it was in chronological order.
Close to that moment was the last issue of Thunderstrike where, the second full-page splash page - of the entire series - Thor shed a single tear when he realised Eric was dead.
Bugger, I've lost my place.
Respect. That's it.
Bendis doesn't seem to respect the Avengers, or the concept of Avengers. He plays with his little favourites, turning it into issues of Marvel Comics Presents - which also focused on Wolverine.
Bring back my Heroes.
Bring back the Avengers.
(Sorry if this turned into an article. I have a tendency to get self-righteous and verbose after a six pack.)