|
|
Post by thew40 on Apr 1, 2007 22:22:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Bong on Apr 1, 2007 23:55:25 GMT -5
Bagley - Bendis= Better comics (In this case, less is deninitely more...)!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by thew40 on Apr 2, 2007 7:48:28 GMT -5
Bagley - Bendis= Better comics (In this case, less is deninitely more...)!!! Their run on "Ultimate Spider-Man" is just fantastic. Maybe with the two of them on "Mighty Avengers," they can channel some of that good energy. And make a great book into a fantastic book! ;D  ~W~ |
|
|
|
Post by balok on Apr 2, 2007 9:50:24 GMT -5
Bagley should improve the book, but I still don't like Bendis, and I can't support what I don't like any longer.
That's the change Civil War made in me: my completist genes are burned out. No longer will I "give a book a chance" or "give a writer some time." When I read and issue and don't like it, I won't be back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Doom on Apr 2, 2007 10:25:58 GMT -5
I am so utterly terrified for Doom right now that it's not funny.
|
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Apr 2, 2007 10:31:16 GMT -5
Bagley = pretty good Spidey artist. But, can he pull off characters who rely on strength and not the wiry ability to bounce off walls, etc.? Ditko couldn't...
|
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Doom on Apr 2, 2007 10:52:39 GMT -5
Well Bagley WAS the original Thunderbolts artist, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by dlw66 on Apr 2, 2007 11:53:16 GMT -5
True. I'm just not that big a fan of his work. I didn't care for him on Amazing Spider-Man, but for some reason he seemed to work on Ultimate Spider-Man. Not sure why -- probably just me. I just wouldn't fancy him an Avengers artist. Maybe too much like Erik Larsen?  |
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Doom on Apr 2, 2007 16:24:08 GMT -5
Not sure myself but I can see him more than Angel Medina...
|
|
|
|
Post by balok on Apr 9, 2007 18:35:46 GMT -5
The chief problem with Bagley's art is that all of his characters appear lanky; even musclebound tanks like Ares will show this tendency. But his style is clear and his lines are precise, which would be a great relief to anyone familiar with the chicken scratch of Bill Sienkiwicz (sp?) or Yu, both awful artists unless they have an inker who can compensate for their shortcomings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nutcase65 on Apr 10, 2007 16:22:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Bong on Apr 10, 2007 17:42:29 GMT -5
Am I nuts (no pun intended THIS time....) or have Doom & Nutcase switched identities all OVER the board... It must be that diabolical trick the Ovoids taught Doom...!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Doom on Apr 10, 2007 17:46:13 GMT -5
What rubbish is this? Of course not.
For example:
...
Marvel suck!
Doom would explode if he tried to say that!
|
|
|
|
Post by Nutcase65 on Apr 10, 2007 17:51:24 GMT -5
Doom is above such petty trickery. How dar you try to sully the name of DOOM!
|
|
|
|
Post by thew40 on Apr 10, 2007 19:14:24 GMT -5
What . . . the . . . ****ing . . . heck?
~W~
|
|
|
|
Post by The Night Phantom on Apr 14, 2007 16:59:18 GMT -5
Regarding Bill Sienkiewicz—I’ve never cared for his work as a sequential artist, but I have enjoyed his style on single-image works. He did a New Universe poster I adore, and I also recall liking some Star Trek-related covers he did for DC.
|
|
|
|
Post by balok on Apr 14, 2007 23:03:30 GMT -5
I found him very scratchy, and I can envision some books he'd work well on, but without an inker who can compensate for his shortcomings, I found him difficult to endure.
|
|
